Eis um paper que não vais encontrar referido na imprensa, de certeza absoluta.

S. V. Subramanian, Professor de Harvard, e Akhil Kumar, Professor da Turner Fenton, publicaram recentemente um estudo que vai com certeza ficar condenado ao esquecimento, porque as suas conclusões destroem por completo a narrativa oficial sobre a pandemia e as vacinas.

Isto embora seja difícil contrariar as conclusões dos dois cientistas sociais, porque o paper trabalha evidências estatísticas que são públicas e fáceis de congregar.

E as conclusões resumem-se nesta frase limpinha: com base nos números oficiais de 68 países e 2947 condados dos Estados Unidos da América, o aumento de casos de COVID-19 não está relacionado com os níveis de vacinação.

Bum.



Entre outros parágrafos brutais, o documento apresenta estas cristalinas pérolas:

At the country-level, there appears to be no discernable relationship between percentage of population fully vaccinated and new COVID-19 cases in the last 7 days. In fact, the trend line suggests a marginally positive association such that countries with higher percentage of population fully vaccinated have higher COVID-19 cases per 1 million people. Notably, Israel with over 60% of their population fully vaccinated had the highest COVID-19 cases per 1 million people in the last 7 days. The lack of a meaningful association between percentage population fully vaccinated and new COVID-19 cases is further exemplified, for instance, by comparison of Iceland and Portugal. Both countries have over 75% of their population fully vaccinated and have more COVID-19 cases per 1 million people than countries such as Vietnam and South Africa that have around 10% of their population fully vaccinated.

(...) In a report released from the Ministry of Health in Israel, the effectiveness of 2 doses of the BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) vaccine against preventing COVID-19 infection was reported to be 39%, substantially lower than the trial efficacy of 96%. It is also emerging that immunity derived from the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine may not be as strong as immunity acquired through recovery from the COVID-19 virus. A substantial decline in immunity from mRNA vaccines 6-months post immunization has also been reported.

In summary, even as efforts should be made to encourage populations to get vaccinated it should be done so with humility and respect. Stigmatizing populations can do more harm than good. Importantly, other non-pharmacological prevention efforts (...) needs to be renewed in order to strike the balance of learning to live with COVID-19 in the same manner we continue to live a 100 years later with various seasonal alterations of the 1918 Influenza virus.

Perante as evidências, não quererás, atento leitor, tirar as tuas próprias conclusões? Ou preferes continuar a ingerir a merda pré-fabricada, falsificada, propagandista e sem qualquer relação com a realidade, que te impingem todos os dias no telejornal?